![]() |
Riverside State Hospital | | | Gatherings | ![]() |
|
|||
Please remember that the comments posted here are not the opinions of opacity.us or its affiliates.
Comments pertaining to real location names, methods of entering the property, promotions or advertisements, off-topic discussion and general flaming, as well as those submitted under various aliases are subject to immediate deletion and your ip address being banned from this website. By submitting your comment you agree to these terms. Visit the forum for off-topic and general discussion. To prevent your comment from being removed and to help keep this site uncluttered, please read more about comments on opacity.
Memories and stories from past employees, visitors or patients are gratefully welcomed, they help keep these places alive!
![]() |
Riverside State Hospital | | | Gatherings | ![]() |
HIPAA is a federal law and applies in all states.
As a clinical psychologist I always had to honor confidentiality, both while the person was "under my care" and even after they left, unless they signed a waiver of some sort. But even then you get into the habit of not discussing people who have been in your care such that they could ever be identified, and even when you have permission to discuss a specific case you always alter the details just enough to protect the person's identity.
And kty, you are right - I can't imagine anything more embarrassing than finding myself described in all my glory somewhere by name when my life wasn't working out well. That's why I am tickled and most appreciative that Motts doesn't divulge what he has found in these places. It is excruciatingly difficult to be in such a spot that you need to go (or be taken) somewhere for help, and then to think that people would be reading your personal records years later describing when you were at your darkest point in time - this would be the ultimate humiliation. To me that is much more "abusive" than many of the things that seem to bother people if they aren't familiar with this field.
Then again, there is the possibility that this is administrative paperwork (order forms, employee info, etc) that truly wasn't important at all. It's like Lynne says, these employees were truly (usually) doing the best they could, and wouldn't abuse patients like this on purpose...
Assuming you found the file of "Fred Bloggs" 20 years ago unless you knew him or he was somehow famous you probably wouldn't track him down or have any way to even publicize this info.
So in the end the information didn't matter it was like a story on a floor. Nowadays you can search for people on the web, or post a picture or scan of the medical record and then it's easy for someone to put 2 and 2 together. That's why confidentiality is now much more vital than before.