![]() |
Foxboro State Hospital | | | Transitions | ![]() |
|
|||
Please remember that the comments posted here are not the opinions of opacity.us or its affiliates.
Comments pertaining to real location names, methods of entering the property, promotions or advertisements, off-topic discussion and general flaming, as well as those submitted under various aliases are subject to immediate deletion and your ip address being banned from this website. By submitting your comment you agree to these terms. Visit the forum for off-topic and general discussion. To prevent your comment from being removed and to help keep this site uncluttered, please read more about comments on opacity.
Memories and stories from past employees, visitors or patients are gratefully welcomed, they help keep these places alive!
![]() |
Foxboro State Hospital | | | Transitions | ![]() |
It also ruined the sides of the bathtub.
But (even being new here) I can still hear you on that one!!! ....Your the greatest!!!
And thanks Motts for the pics they are great as always!!
i'll need a tb shot just looking at that thing.
(:
1) Were the experiments done in the bathtub, or was the tub used to clean the patients afterward?
2) If you don't know what kind of experiments they were, how do you know there were any experiments at all?
3) If you can't describe the "experimental juices," how do you know there were any juices at all?
4)If these barbaric experiments were done, why weren't the records destroyed? Obviously this sort of experimentation would have to remain secret, but the records were just dumped in an old farmhouse?
5) Just how did you become the one--the few-- who knows all these dreadful secrets? With all the class action lawsuits that led to deinstitutionalization, wouldn't some lawyer have already come across this experimentation and used it to help win the case?
Now a few facts:
1) There was a strong eugenics movement in the US, which the National Socialist Party under Hitler took to the gross atrocities of the "Final Solution." By the time the Nazis were in full force committing crimes against humanity, the eugenics movement in the US was in decline.
2) Involuntary sterilization operations were done in the US, made legal under state laws and upheld by the Supreme Court in a majority opinion written by Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. There were a few doctors who thought that it was best to withhold treatment from newborns with severe abnormalities, but this never went further than a few isolated cases. While there were plenty of people who wanted to prevent individuals with mental illness, and more particularly those with mental retardation, from having children, there was never any proposal to "eliminate" people already living. An excellent book on these topics is "War Against the Weak: Eugenics and America's Campaign to Create a Master Race" by Edwin Black.
3)There were experiments done without the kind of informed consent and other ethical safeguards we consider mandatory today, but those experiments were not exclusive to psychiatric hospitals and institutions for people with developmental disabilities (think of the Tuskegee airmen or the studies of deliberate air contamination over towns and schools, etc.).
Finally, it is always a good idea to question, to verify, to THINK. Sometimes people take a subject that has a grain of truth, and expand on it until it fills a whole silo, just to see how much outrageous BS they can get others to accept. Believing and spreading this kind of garbage does nothing to further the cause of better care for people with mental disabilities. It only makes people skeptical of everything you say, and plenty of regrettable actions really did happen. There's no need to embellish with such far-fetched nonsense that serves only to diminish the real suffering that did occur.
sorry so long. I tried to not say anything, but the more I thought about it, the more I had to respond. At least I finally figured out how to arrange my posts in paragraphs instead of one big block :-)
The director responded, "We fill up a bathtub and offer the patient either a spoon, a cup or a bucket and ask them to empty it. According to their decision as to what method to use, we decide whether or not to admit them.
"I see," said the visitor, "the reasonable person would of course choose the bucket that is bigger than the cup or the spoon."
"Well, no," said the director, "a normal person would unplug the drain. What type of room would you prefer, private or double, or a ward?"
Dedicated to my friends who choose the bucket.