![]() |
Fuller State School and Hospital | | | Disturbed | ![]() |
|
|||
Please remember that the comments posted here are not the opinions of opacity.us or its affiliates.
Comments pertaining to real location names, methods of entering the property, promotions or advertisements, off-topic discussion and general flaming, as well as those submitted under various aliases are subject to immediate deletion and your ip address being banned from this website. By submitting your comment you agree to these terms. Visit the forum for off-topic and general discussion. To prevent your comment from being removed and to help keep this site uncluttered, please read more about comments on opacity.
Memories and stories from past employees, visitors or patients are gratefully welcomed, they help keep these places alive!
![]() |
Fuller State School and Hospital | | | Disturbed | ![]() |
Poor kids,I can't stand looking at it.
If this is an actual baby crib, it possibly was for a child born here ( think about it)...the childs' future being dependant on the relatives or adoption services. So these babies might not have had a horrible future....
(I don't think a baby was placed in hospitals that young?)
Luckily, that does not happen anymore because the states are more responsible about helping families of children with multiple needs stay at home now. That is a VERY recent change in the field and is still a problem in many places with very long waiting lists for families to receive services. For years families were told they would not receive any funding or assistance for their children unless they gave up their rights to them and had them placed, and to keep a child at home with multiple physical disabilities is not only expensive but it is very draining, because you have to have someone right there 24/7. Most institutions now try not to take anyone under 21 if at all possible, and in many states a person cannot be admitted until they are 21+.
I still talk with families who are wracked with guilt years later for having been pressured into placing their child at such a young age. However, I also talk with families who are thrilled that their loved ones were placed in an institutional setting, and are happy with their care, and who would have it no other way. It obviously depends on the era in which you were raised, what resources were available when your loved one was young, and how the institutional experience has been for you and your family. Every time an institution is scheduled to shut, even if there have been horrible abuses documented, the families have generally been the strongest supporters of the institution, either because their specific loved one received excellent care there or because they have seen that similar horrors can also happen in the community.
One thing to say about institutions, especially these days - on every shift every day each client gets a good going over from head to toe by the oncoming shift, and any scratches, bruises, or tiny dings are immediately reported and investigated. This means that at least three times a day each person is looked at and assessed physically, often by multiple staff. It is very difficult these days for abuse to slide by without being reported and/or investigated, because anyone who knows that an injury occurred (whether through abuse or not) and didn't report it can be terminated for neglect. And there are people whose entire job is to analyze the pattern of injuries that occur and investigate any irregularities. As well, there are numerous external agencies who monitor the reports and there are advocates who go through the areas and read all the medical reports every day.
As much as I prefer the overall freedom of community living, I have to admit that they do not have this degree of oversight out there and unless there is a very involved case manager, family, or agency, much can occur that no one knows about because they don't have the same number of eyes looking things over.
As I have said repeatedly, as much as I adore working with this specific population, it can be a very challenging and frustrating group to work with, and since they cannot report if someone hurts them, you have to take an awful lot on faith, much more than I would personally like to take. :-(
To expect a parent or parents to take physical abuse, watch him 24.7 without a break etc is not always possible. What can be possible to to find a placement where the child will be treated correctly, ethically and with love.
Places that do not take care of the needs of a child are never ever okay and simply put more guilt on the parents who have to make the hardest decision of their own lives.
Interesting stuff! I wish people could see this through your eyes as well.
too often.
=)
Parents didn't "dump" their children in state facilities because they didn't understand what they had. There was a lot of cultural push at the time and no community supports available for parents who had children at home with challenging needs. The parents who placed their children in facilities such as this did it because they believed at the time it was the best thing to do for their child. Most of them felt guilty already, even though they were told it was the "right" thing to do. I have a lot of empathy for these families because of the position they were put in.
In other cases babies and children were physically dragged from their parents and removed from their care all due to the fact that physically or psychologically they did not conform to society's view of normal children.
In a majority of the cases it was under medical advice that children were admitted to these places, although there were parents who were willing to "rid themselves of such a burden".
Its such a sad thing. I knew i loved both my babies before i met them, i know that i could never turn their care over to anyone else.
Apologies for any offence caused by the earlier comment, looking back it does sound ignorant but that was not my intention.
You would think perhaps a third- world country could use a crib like that.. Clean it up, and find some one to ship it ( perhaps for free)
Today there is much better access to funding for in-home services, but there are certain catches to the funding in some states and sometimes the funding decreases or disappears when the person "ages out of the program" at age 22. It's something this society still hasn't decided definitively how to deal with and a very sore spot for people with disabilities and their families.
We don't use cribs like this any more because they are potentially hazardous - it's too easy to catch an arm, leg, or a head in the bars. Current beds are supposed to be built with safety in mind and have to go through all sorts of rigorous standards and testing. Where I currently work every bed on campus has to be checked multiple times each month by various staff (program administrator, safety representative, program director, housekeeping, quality assurance, AND buildings & grounds staff) and documentation provided that this occurred.
My co-worker and I were out with the kids one day on the field behind the ymca and I looked up and shouted "my gods we have to go in now!!" There was a tornato! Well 25 kids ran towards the gym and I yell "Chris" (The 7 year old with DS) Well, ol "Chris" was ahead of the pack by far! He was the first to the Gym!!
By: Elke
Go to any normal hospital and you will find a cot with bars like this. It's normal. <
This. These cots are extremely common and are standard issue. My 2.5 year old has been in them many times when hospitalized for asthma issues
imagine the babies that did lay in this crib everyday that were mistreated/neglected so sad to know that a baby so small can be in there and how do they know the child has mental problems that early when they barely know how to suck on a nipple!!!!
So, I was in that type of bed for quite some time in hospitals getting surgeries and what not.
This was also the 1970's if anyone was wondering.
Its haunting isnt it?