![]() |
Danvers State Hospital | | | Tiptoe | ![]() |
|
|||
Please remember that the comments posted here are not the opinions of opacity.us or its affiliates.
Comments pertaining to real location names, methods of entering the property, promotions or advertisements, off-topic discussion and general flaming, as well as those submitted under various aliases are subject to immediate deletion and your ip address being banned from this website. By submitting your comment you agree to these terms. Visit the forum for off-topic and general discussion. To prevent your comment from being removed and to help keep this site uncluttered, please read more about comments on opacity.
Memories and stories from past employees, visitors or patients are gratefully welcomed, they help keep these places alive!
![]() |
Danvers State Hospital | | | Tiptoe | ![]() |
The inpatient orderly becomes equally flush
A flailing patient attempts to prevail
The orderly will later remove skin from his nails
Wow! I guess a picture does speak a thousand words...
I know for a fact that your information is incorrect. :-)
Stripling, M. "BIOETHICS AND MEDICAL ISSUES IN LITERATURE." Westport Ct.: Greenwood Press, 2005
http://www.medicalhumanities.net/chapter.html
"Cold pack" is not the same as "continuous water hydrotherapy" in a tub. Cold pack consisted of very cold, wet sheets wrapped around a person which they were kept in for hours at a time; usually either until they warmed the sheets up or until they quieted down. The theory behind the technique was to cool the person off because they were thought to be overly agitated, and the coldness of the sheets was to "counteract" the believed hotness of the blood, which supposedly caused the agitation.
The tubs were not cold; the sheets were cold. Both "therapies" had the same name, so people get confused and think the tubs were cold. If anyone ever used an ice cold tub full of water to immerse a patient they were not doing it to be therapeutic. If you are at all familiar with how much temperature variation a body can stand, you will quickly figure out that to put someone in a tub full of very cold water for any longer than a short period of time is fatal. If you killed off too many of your patients, even back in the "dark ages" of 50 years ago, you would quickly be investigated.
Regardless, the idea was not to torture people; there was a true belief that this technique helped people. The stats weren't that bad when there were NO other interventions that worked. And yes, you had nuts and sadists and torturers back then, just like you do now, who, when they were underfunded and stressed out, did pretty nasty things to people. Sort of like what that jerk who lives down the street from us does to his or her child and yet most of us still won't "get involved" for fear of a lawsuit or a violent confrontation.
In hindsight it is easy to be critical of what happened 50 to 75 years ago when there were no ways of treating people other than locking them up. The way we got to the few treatments we have today was by trying out new ideas and keeping the ones that worked. That is called science. Cures and interventions don't spontaneously generate. Hypotheses are formulated, techniques are tried, and if they don't work, you go back to the drawing board. I can't be horribly critical of people for what they didn't know at the time, but at least they were trying something.
What's better is that I am learning to appreciate all the work that goes into Mental Health Care.
I know that it is a field that is sorely in need of the right kinds of people to go into this section of medical care.
I have also learned more about the old ways of treating illnesses, and that it isn't the 1800's where you can be a lobotomy candidate for masturbating.
You do Motts, this site, and us a great service by being here and working to advocate proper treatment and care of the patients. I am proud to read your comments and rally behind you as you remember to {thump} us all on the head with the knowledge you posess.
Thank you very much for all you do, both here and on your job.
Just pick a more credible source, please, instead of the black-&-white folks who get paid large consultation fees to say this.
These are some nice pictures. You have an amazing eye for photography, as well as nerves of steel. You couldnt pay me to go in there alone!
im a lot more historically sensitive to these sort of things than i may come off as at first. i was just expressing my personal thoughts that this particular image generated in me, and it did weird me out slightly.
i browse this place to learn about the historic value of these sites, not fantasize about knife wielding maniacs and insane freaks
seriously tho, i've just read "Mad in America" and it's extremely thought-provoking. the thing that comes across throughout (and yes, some of the treatments seem startling in today's context) is that every treatment was designed IN AN EFFORT TO HELP PATIENTS. misguided or not, there it is. and a lot of it was - i don't think anyone would try to deny it. the road to hell and all that...
I loved picking the brains of old time employees who were working there at the time.
know your history I'm sure the syringes megale used were not created for injecting toxic chemicals into the eyes of twins .... but that is what he did with them. My point is not all that is created for good will be used that way.... History speaks for itself and I agree with the post above " a picture is worth a thousand words" There is nothing theraputic looking about this tub against a wall....
Peace, my friend. :-)