|
|
Nechevo"here was a"
A what? Talk about a cliffhanger! |
|---|
Location: Salesian School Gallery: Forgotten Prayers
|
|
NechevoThat pole in the middle is Motts, he's very skinny.
|
|---|
Location: Bannerman's Arsenal Gallery: The Island
|
|
NechevoWow I bet a person could make a ton of money by selling those vintage Studebaker engines...
:) |
|---|
Location: Studebaker Stamping Plant Gallery: Around the Bend
Location: The Ladd School Gallery: Brownfields
|
|
NechevoWould you prefer a happy, cheerful design for a morgue?
|
|---|
Location: The Ladd School Gallery: Brownfields
Nechevo
After a certain point a building is just not salvagable. It has rotted away for a long time and at this point it would not be worth the large amount of money it would take to reconstruct the building in a way that would be safe to those that would inhabit it.
It's sad yes, but it makes sense. For everyone that complains about companies choosing to go the less costly route of demolishing and replacing the building instead of renovating, are you willing to foot the bill? Are you wiling to pay the huge amount of money it would take to renovate the building in order to keep "the history alive" even if said renovations would result in a building that probably wouldn't be as functional for your purposes as a new purpose build building would be?
Yes it's sad to see old buildings be demolished but sometimes practicality has to come in play. Sometimes it's just not worth the extra cost (since no one is willing or able to pay that extra cost) just for the sake of history. Really it's the original abandoning that needs to be stopped. Find a way to keep these old buildings in use even just as a way to keep the buildings from rotting while someone figures out what to use them for. But if a company can't afford to keep their property going and no one wants to or can buy it what choices are there?
Location: Salesian School Gallery: Forgotten Prayers