well seriously people do you really belive this bull shit. It was just some damn grafitti! Get with the fucking program

If there are any real pressing personal issues at stake here feel free to instant message me at pizzahead19.

I see no real need for you to attack me with profane words, I am not here to fight with you. I am here to comment on a fellow photographers work and to put in my two cents, if you will. And no I am not jealous of Mr. Mott's ability (No real offence Motts, I may have been inebriated at the time of my Northampton comments). I do enjoy seeing the repsonses of the more than loyal following on this website, though.

E-mail this photo to Joel Peter Witkin, I dare you.

This digital "photograph" is a physical impossibility. I believe only a man like Ansel Adams could achieve a depth of field that deep, and he didn't use photoshop.

Well I do believe proscenium can also mean a direct or "straight on" approach to a subject, i.e. Wes Anderson. But I suppose dictionary.com didn't go to film school.

whats with all this symmetry jazz, is it freestyle jazz?

Im not quite sure what you are trying to show me with this photo because im still lost on what this picture really is? I mean if you know can you tell me i would really like to see what the rage is all about. this picture is way too proscenium!

so pal whats this photo all about? I think its a terrible angle. and a terrible subject. Hows about you get some brains pal?

i do belive that this peticular hallway was the set for a little movie called "In Dreams" and it was painted for the set. i suggest you watch it. you might see what im talking about. thank you for your time and money?